On Jan 17 18:33, Richard Levitte wrote: > In message <20160117172014.gc16...@calimero.vinschen.de> on Sun, 17 Jan 2016 > 18:20:14 +0100, Corinna Vinschen <vinsc...@redhat.com> said: > > vinschen> On Jan 17 18:13, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > vinschen> > On Jan 17 17:50, Richard Levitte wrote: > vinschen> > > In message <20160117154353.gc9...@calimero.vinschen.de> on Sun, > 17 Jan 2016 16:43:53 +0100, Corinna Vinschen <vinsc...@redhat.com> said: > vinschen> > > > vinschen> > > vinschen> On Jan 17 01:04, Richard Levitte wrote: > vinschen> > > vinschen> > If you have a look in "config", it doesn't generate > "Cygwin-x86_64" at > vinschen> > > vinschen> > all. Would you be willing to have a look at that > script and modernise > vinschen> > > vinschen> > it regarding Cygwin? > vinschen> > > vinschen> > vinschen> > > vinschen> Like the attached? > vinschen> > > > vinschen> > > Thank you, that helped... it was less traumatic than I > imagined ;-) > vinschen> > > I've attached a small fixup, your thoughts? > vinschen> > > vinschen> > Well, that works, too. But if we ever support another > architecture, > vinschen> > we'd have to tweak two files, config and 10-main.conf, rather > then just > vinschen> > one, 10-main.conf. > vinschen> > vinschen> Btw., when calling Configure rather than config, i686 would be > simpler > vinschen> for the package builder since it could just use the build variable > vinschen> ${ARCH}, rather than having to check and explicitely turn this to > "x86". > vinschen> > vinschen> > vinschen> Just saying... > > I was just thinking of that, as well as a backward compatibility name > Cygwin.
Looks good to me, as discussed in PM. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Maintainer Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev