On Jan 17 18:33, Richard Levitte wrote:
> In message <20160117172014.gc16...@calimero.vinschen.de> on Sun, 17 Jan 2016
> 18:20:14 +0100, Corinna Vinschen <vinsc...@redhat.com> said:
>
> vinschen> On Jan 17 18:13, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> vinschen> > On Jan 17 17:50, Richard Levitte wrote:
> vinschen> > > In message <20160117154353.gc9...@calimero.vinschen.de> on Sun,
> 17 Jan 2016 16:43:53 +0100, Corinna Vinschen <vinsc...@redhat.com> said:
> vinschen> > >
> vinschen> > > vinschen> On Jan 17 01:04, Richard Levitte wrote:
> vinschen> > > vinschen> > If you have a look in "config", it doesn't generate
> "Cygwin-x86_64" at
> vinschen> > > vinschen> > all. Would you be willing to have a look at that
> script and modernise
> vinschen> > > vinschen> > it regarding Cygwin?
> vinschen> > > vinschen>
> vinschen> > > vinschen> Like the attached?
> vinschen> > >
> vinschen> > > Thank you, that helped... it was less traumatic than I
> imagined ;-)
> vinschen> > > I've attached a small fixup, your thoughts?
> vinschen> >
> vinschen> > Well, that works, too. But if we ever support another
> architecture,
> vinschen> > we'd have to tweak two files, config and 10-main.conf, rather
> then just
> vinschen> > one, 10-main.conf.
> vinschen>
> vinschen> Btw., when calling Configure rather than config, i686 would be
> simpler
> vinschen> for the package builder since it could just use the build variable
> vinschen> ${ARCH}, rather than having to check and explicitely turn this to
> "x86".
> vinschen>
> vinschen>
> vinschen> Just saying...
>
> I was just thinking of that, as well as a backward compatibility name
> Cygwin.Looks good to me, as discussed in PM. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Maintainer Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
