-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Really?
That's all we get, a one-liner, no explanation, no rationale, response? It's not even "brand new" functionality, Camellia as a raw cipher is already in there, the only difference is wrapping it into GCM-based suites. Patches are available, too. Sounds like OpenSSL isn't as open as one might think. On 04/02/2016 05:38, Rich Salz via RT wrote: > We're not taking on these new Camellia ciphers for now. -- Rich Salz, > OpenSSL dev team; [email protected] > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32) iF4EAREIAAYFAlazIiQACgkQEguw022l8qw2wQD8CuBYlCXVKk2VUvMSxYcqnKDg LULZr0x5hCfalVbl/cIA/3Ro3hbllmrL6RqBy6ir/l6bUSmlWnB+nG++scYIkNem =koMx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
