-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 04/02/2016 14:08, Salz, Rich via RT wrote: > >> That's all we get, a one-liner, no explanation, no rationale, >> response? > > Take a look at some of the discussion here: > https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/374 > https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/154 > https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/148
None of these have any discussion. 148 and 154 are dupes and got merged. 374 was closed because nobody bothered to give it any attention and the dev got tired of rebasing when there was no indication that it would ever get attention. What did you expect, that someone would just keep working on something for naught? So, basically, you ignored someone long enough that they dropped it. Once again, no explanation is given, no rationale. Are you being put under pressure by someone? Should someone make a sane fork of OpenSSL instead? Or can we just actually work together to improve a lib here? Seriously. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32) iF4EAREIAAYFAlazVn8ACgkQEguw022l8qx3rgEAndOysatLhd3j5LxxIdhfMiAS I3ZEyMQQxgewPU60CQ8A/2vkByqPlDCrHITP3+ZQTh/ffwOgMlNugvqGjDW0s2BE =qACi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4075 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted _______________________________________________ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
