On Friday 26 February 2016 17:37:11 Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 05:29:26PM +0000, Salz, Rich wrote: > > As just about the only team member who trolls through RT and closes > > things with any quantity, I am not sure that I agree that fixing a > > bug requires documentation if the API isn't already documented. > > We should also get the word out that contributed patches (RT or > Github) without documentation will take much longer to get adopted > (will require someone else to find the time to create the > documentation). > > Priority will go to patches with sufficiently complete documentation.
https://github.com/blog/1184-contributing-guidelines https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING it just needs to be updated -- Regards, Hubert Kario Senior Quality Engineer, QE BaseOS Security team Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
