Hi Rich,

Salz, Rich wrote:
Can you look at https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1044 and see if it 
addresses the issues?
Yes.

May be with some definitions for backward compatibility. I mean for renamed pre 1.1 functions - with inserted ..._CTX.... into name of :
- X509_STORE_get_by_subject
- X509_STOREget1_{certs|crls}

I understand idea of new function X509_STORE_CTX_get_X509_by_subject. X509 is misleading.
What about X509_STORE_CTX_get_obj_by_subject?

Regards,
Roumen


--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

Reply via email to