> > Can you look at https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1044 and see if it
> addresses the issues?
> Yes.
Great, thanks!
> May be with some definitions for backward compatibility. I mean for
> renamed pre 1.1 functions - with inserted ..._CTX.... into name of :
> - X509_STORE_get_by_subject
> - X509_STOREget1_{certs|crls}
Added #define's for the old names.
> I understand idea of new function X509_STORE_CTX_get_X509_by_subject.
> X509 is misleading.
> What about X509_STORE_CTX_get_obj_by_subject?
That's better.
I pushed a new version that adds your feedback.
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
