> > Can you look at https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1044 and see if it > addresses the issues? > Yes.
Great, thanks! > May be with some definitions for backward compatibility. I mean for > renamed pre 1.1 functions - with inserted ..._CTX.... into name of : > - X509_STORE_get_by_subject > - X509_STOREget1_{certs|crls} Added #define's for the old names. > I understand idea of new function X509_STORE_CTX_get_X509_by_subject. > X509 is misleading. > What about X509_STORE_CTX_get_obj_by_subject? That's better. I pushed a new version that adds your feedback. -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev