On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 08:15:04AM -0500, Mark H. Wood wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
> > To be precise: according to the OpenSSL license every program that uses
> > the library and advertises its SSL capabilities also must advertise the
> > use of OpenSSL.
>
> Actually this is a problem -- it means you can't link OpenSSL libraries
> with any GPLed code which you intend to distribute. I'm facing the
> necessity of having to use the not-quite-ready-for-prime-time GNUtls
> package instead of OpenSSL for a project I'm contemplating, because it
> builds on an application licensed under the GPL. (And I have no idea how
> hard it's going to be to get *both* compatibly installed on one box.)
>
> IIRC the Ethereal folk have also run up against this problem.
>
> I'm not asking for anything at this time; I just wanted to provide a
> couple of data points.
Besides the "OpenSSL" license itself large parts of the code were written
by EAY and his license still applies without any option of the OpenSSL
team to influence it as long as EAY does not change his license.
The OpenSSL team members are aware of this problem but there is not much
we can do for the reason stated above.
Best regards,
Lutz
--
Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik
Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
