In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 2 Mar 2004 16:58:29 +0100, "Giovanni Calzuola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
giovanni.calzuola> I'd like to use 2 or more engines without using the giovanni.calzuola> functions ENGINE_set_default, due to problems of giovanni.calzuola> concurrency. I want to sign with a hardware key, giovanni.calzuola> while using software keys for SSL. giovanni.calzuola> How can I do this? Hmm, we don't have separation of operations with the ENGINE framework, just separation of algorithm. You *could* hack an engine that loads another engine, but creates methods of it's own where some functions come from the other engine it loaded and other are OpenSSL-native. That's quite a hack, but I think it's doable. Now, for the separation between SSL and "signing", do you know that there's a little bit of signing going on in SSL as well? ----- Please consider sponsoring my work on free software. See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details. -- Richard Levitte \ Tunnlandsvägen 52 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ S-168 36 BROMMA \ T: +46-708-26 53 44 \ SWEDEN \ Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
