Hi Richard. thanks for your reply. In my experiments so far, I have seen the messages about size_t and unsigned long. This is the one that worried me some.
How can I watch for news about this work? Dave -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 4:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OpenSSL 0.9.7d WIN - IA64 port In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED] mcast.net> on Mon, 16 Aug 2004 17:41:29 +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: d.mclellan> Hi: I'm now investigating build OpenSSL -0.9.7d on a WIN d.mclellan> IA64 architecture machine. Has anyone had any experience d.mclellan> with this, or is there any active work in progress to d.mclellan> support WIN IA64 platforms? d.mclellan> Thanks very much. The absolutely biggest problem is that size_t is 64 bits while unsigned long is 32 bits. This leads to a ton of warnings/errors concerning size differences when OpenSSL uses unsigned long, unsigned int or int for things that should really be size_t. There's a branch where work on this is done, although very slowly (at least for the moment). If I didn't have to spend time chasing down finances to survive, that would be one of those things I'd work on, as it also concerns a favorite O/S of mine, VMS. ----- Please consider sponsoring my work on free software. See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details. -- Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://richard.levitte.org/ ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
