On Thu June 11 2009, Paul Rogers wrote: > On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:30:21 +1000, "Jeremy Hunt" > <jere...@optimation.com.au> said: > > > Yep, I just got a new copy this morning. openssl-0.9.7g in the > > > openssl download repository is bad and has been for some time. > > > There's a bad link in test/fips-aesdata, missing file in > > > crypto/fips/aes, IIRC. > > > > > I just resurrected an old system, not quite as old as yours, > > downloaded openssl.0.9.7g, ran configure pretty much as I advised you > > (I had to drop -lsocket), and ran make, make test and make install. > > After that message I downloaded 0.9.7h and it had the bad link, missing > file as well, so went down a minor and grabbed 0.9.6h, which installed > smooth using a tweaked linux-elf, and passed the tests (on a P///). > Still not sure if those hand tweaked object files will work on a > 386/486. >
If you are speaking of the x86 asm functions that contain sse instructions - No, not on a 386/486 Mike > > I suspect your real problem is your environment, or possibly you have > > broken your Makefiles. > > bash-2.04 is missing some of the facilities of 2.05, and in the chroot > environment I'm using the host's 2.4 kernel instead of 2.2. > -- > Paul Rogers > paulgrog...@fastmail.fm > http://www.xprt.net/~pgrogers/ > Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates." > (I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-) > > > ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
