> So I wasted my precious time preparing a patch while someone > else had already posted a patch off-list. Lol... If you're going to throw a tantrum every time someone beats you ta a patch, you owe us a tantrum:
WinCE patch: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg61765.html Pierre Delaage submission: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg28264.html :) On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 7:20 AM, Jakob Bohm <[email protected]> wrote: > On 19-10-2010 12:32, per frykenvall wrote: >> >> Thanks, Jakob! However, I followed Dr. Stephen Hensons advice earlier in >> this thread and filed a report to the bug tracker, and got a resolution from >> Andy Polyakov a week ago, based on your suggestion. I've tested it and am >> fully satisfied: >> >> [openssl.org #2356] Resolved: LNK4078 and LNK4210 linking with x64 static >> libs >> http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=19935 >> > So I wasted my precious time preparing a patch while someone else had > already posted a > patch off-list. > > Thanks to everyone involved for not telling the list that this issue had > been resolved in another forum! > > >> Of course, that resolution does not include the race condition you >> describe. >> >> Best regards, >> Per >> >> On 2010-10-18 17:35, Jakob Bohm wrote: >>> >>> I have now created an actual patch to fix this. >>> It turns out to be a small pattern bug in x86_64xlate.pl >>> >>> Patch attached as openssl-1.0.0a-x86_64attr.patch. >>> >>> While debugging this patch I ran into an unrelated issue where nmake >>> would invoke nasm before the .asm file had been completely output. >>> This is probably a bug in the perl build used on one of the test >>> machines, but I think the patch to kludge around that race condition >>> might be useful too. >>> >>> Patch attached as openssl-1.0.0a-x86_64cpuid-build-race.patch. >>> ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [email protected]
