On 12 Apr 2014, at 21:30, Matthias Apitz <g...@unixarea.de> wrote: > El día Saturday, April 12, 2014 a las 09:08:15PM +0200, Michael Tuexen > escribió: > >>> What is the exact bug, can someone show a svn/git diff of the first >>> source version having the bug? >> http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commit;h=4817504d069b4c5082161b02a22116ad75f822b1 >>> > > Hi, > > Thanks for the git diff (and the other statements). Could you please be > so kind and point to the exact place of the offending statement (or > missing boundary check) in the 19 *.[ch] files? I only want (as a C > programmer) to get my own impression of the nature of the issue. Thanks Here is the commit of the fix: http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=731f431497f463f3a2a97236fe0187b11c44aead
Best regards Michael > > matthias > > -- > Sent from my FreeBSD netbook > > Matthias Apitz, <g...@unixarea.de>, http://www.unixarea.de/ f: +49-170-4527211 > UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370) > UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2, FreeBSD since 2.2.5 > ______________________________________________________________________ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org > Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org > ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
