That is the state of software industry today, so no surprises there. Organizations who spend time and effort on fixing code (generic usage) are far and few in between (close to being non-existent).
-Amarendra -- sent via 100% recycled electrons from my mobile command center. > On Apr 13, 2014, at 8:51 AM, Steve Marquess <marqu...@opensslfoundation.com> > wrote: > >> On 04/13/2014 10:54 AM, Michael Ströder wrote: >> ... >> >> A clarifying note especially to OpenSSL developers: >> Many thanks for your work and I feel your pain these days. >> But maybe it's the right time to think about putting two feet on the brake >> pedal against the feature bloat. > > I heartily agree. > > But, as someone who has been working hard to help "keep the lights on" > so that OpenSSL remains viable, I call tell you that while we can find > financial support for adding features, there is no support for "not* > adding features. Or for tedious boring things like release management, > code review, refactoring, documentation, the backlog of worthy patch > contributions, etc. > > -Steve M. > > -- > Steve Marquess > OpenSSL Software Foundation, Inc. > 1829 Mount Ephraim Road > Adamstown, MD 21710 > USA > +1 877 673 6775 s/b > +1 301 874 2571 direct > marqu...@opensslfoundation.com > marqu...@openssl.com > gpg/pgp key: http://openssl.com/docs/0xCE69424E.asc > ______________________________________________________________________ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org > Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List openssl-users@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
