Robert Collins wrote: > So, doing [the 6 monthly] releases and stable branches seem like the > same thing to me : it's packaging up the project output for > consumption by redistributors (and low-resource risk-averse orgs). > That totally makes sense to me as a program - but I think calling it > 'production' would be a bit confusing, as TripleO is focused on > production, whereas releases and stable branches are focused on > distribution, IMNSHO :)
Aah... Naming, my favorite pastime :) "Distribution" makes sense, although it's a bit overloaded too. "Integration" is overloaded too. "Delivery", maybe. "Release and stable branch management" is what we've been calling it so far, but it's a mouthful. We could potentially lump vulnerability management in the same program, since after all it's about handling and distributing security fixes, with a strong focus on stable branches. But since that's a different group that could warrant a separate program. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev