On 26/06/13 22:20, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Stefano Maffulli wrote:
On 06/24/2013 11:50 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
To match with the current state we would end up with:
* Projects (Nova, Neutron, Swift, Glance, Keystone, Horizon, Cinder,
Ceilometer, Heat)
* Incubated projects (Trove, Ironic)
* Programs (Oslo, Infrastructure, Documentation, QA)
I think we should add Translations to the list of Programs: it is
cross-functional to all the Projects, Incubated and Documentation (less
relevant in QA and Infrastructure) but it has special needs, enough to
deserve a small slot at the Design Summit, IMHO.
Daisy: what do you think?
Translations is another "horizontal effort", something that applies to
all projects, like release management or vulnerability handling, but
where contributions actually end up being applied as patches to other
projects, rather than having their own repos. Another example of that
would be the "Python 3" effort.
We have yet to decide if those should be considered programs, or if they
should be recognized in some other way that is not a "program". That
shouldn't block the setup of the first programs though.
Regards,
"""
'OpenStack Programs' are efforts which are essential to the completion
of our mission, but which do not produce deliverables included in the
common release of OpenStack 'integrated' projects every 6 months, like
Projects do.
"""
How is this not true of Translation?
Our mission is: "to produce the ubiquitous Open Source Cloud Computing
platform that will meet the needs of public and private clouds
regardless of size, by being simple to implement and massively scalable."
It seems simple: we cannot be ubiquitous if we're only in English.
Regards,
Topm
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
