On Thu, 2013-09-05 at 11:00 -0400, Russell Bryant wrote: > On 09/05/2013 10:17 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > Hi > > > > I'd like to request a feature freeze exception for the final (and > > admittedly the largest) patch in the series of 40 patches to port Nova > > to oslo.messaging: > > > > https://review.openstack.org/39929 > > > > While this change doesn't provide any immediate user-visible benefit, it > > would be massively helpful in maintaining momentum behind the effort all > > through the Havana cycle to move the RPC code from oslo-incubator into a > > library. > > > > In terms of risk of regression, there is certainly some risk but that > > risk is mitigated by the fact that the core code of each of the > > transport drivers has been modified minimally. The idea was to delay > > re-factoring these drivers until we were sure that we hadn't caused any > > regressions in Nova. The code has been happily passing the > > devstack/tempest based integration tests for 10 days now. > > When do you expect major refactoring to happen in oslo.messaging? I get > that the current code was minimally modified, but I just want to > understand how the timelines line up with the release and ongoing > maintenance of the Havana release.
Yep, good question. AFAIR we discussed this at the last Oslo IRC meeting and decided that re-factoring will wait until Icehouse so we can more easily sync fixes from oslo-incubator to oslo.messaging. Porting Quantum, Cinder, Ceilometer and Heat, memoving the code from oslo-incubator and re-factoring the drivers in oslo.messaging would be goals for early on in the Icehouse cycle. Cheers, Mark. _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
