Robert, Cool! That would be really nice! nova-bm functional tests are the bare minimum we need.
Thanks, Roman On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Robert Collins <robe...@robertcollins.net>wrote: > We deseperately want TripleO in the gate and are working towards it. > However, doing that acceptably fast makes it non-trivial [nested VM's > are kindof slow...]. If there was BYOI in RackSpace and in HP's > non-Beta regions, and custom networking in both clouds, then we could > avoid a layer of nesting and test the different TripleO layers > independently (and concurrently) but sadly thats not the case yet, so > we're having to work on tuning and the occasional hack. > > We hope to have at least functional tests for nova-bm in soon, with > TripleO as a whole following on subsequently to that. > > -Rob > > On 9 September 2013 23:12, Roman Podolyaka <rpodoly...@mirantis.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm ok with both accepting this patch and reverting the commit, which > > introduced the regression, but it would be really nice to have these DB > > optimizations in Nova. > > > > As for your concern of accepting such optimizations. I don't think, it's > a > > problem of such patches themselves, but rather with the lack of > > comprehensive tests of complex OpenStack installations in our CI (at the > > same time I personally believe our CI is the best thing ever happened to > > OpenStack :), CI team you really rock!). > > > > Anyway, TripleO-CI found this regression. Maybe we should consider adding > > its job to Nova check/gate pipelines? > > > > Thanks, > > Roman > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Nikola Đipanov <ndipa...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> > >> On 09/09/13 11:25, Roman Podolyaka wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > There is a patch on review (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/45422/) > >> > fixing https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1221620 which has > >> > importance 'Critical' in Nova and TripleO (long story short: currently > >> > Nova Baremetal deployments with more than one baremetal node won't > >> > work). > >> > > >> > It would be really nice to have this patch reviewed by core > developers, > >> > so we can fix the bug ASAP. > >> > > >> > >> Hey - thanks for responding quickly - I commented on the patch and tbh I > >> am starting to be -1 on this due to issues mentioned on the review. > >> > >> I will accept that my take on this is too conservative :) and remove a > >> -1 if needed to get this in, but at this point, I have some doubts > >> weather this is the right approach. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> N. > >> > >> > >> > Thanks, > >> > Roman > >> > > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > OpenStack-dev mailing list > >> > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >> > > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> OpenStack-dev mailing list > >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OpenStack-dev mailing list > > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > > -- > Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com> > Distinguished Technologist > HP Converged Cloud > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev