+1

From: <Day>, Phil <philip....@hp.com<mailto:philip....@hp.com>>
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List 
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Thursday, September 12, 2013 3:40 PM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List 
(openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>)" 
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: [openstack-dev] Nova FFE request for get scheduler hints API

Hi Folks,

I’d like the following change to be considered for an FFE please:  
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/34291/

This change adds a capability that was agreed as needed at the Havana design 
summit, is functionally complete (including the corresponding python-novaclient 
support (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/38847/), and has been through many 
review cycles since it was first posted in June.   The change includes both V2 
and V3 api changes.

The only remaining review comment at the point when it got hit by FF was 
whether it was appropriate for this change to introduce a secheduler/api.py 
layer rather than following the existing (and exceptional) process of calling 
the scheduler/rpcapi.py methods directly.   Since this is the first query to 
call (rather than cast) into the scheduler it seems to me a sensible 
abstraction to add, and makes the scheduler consistent with all other services 
in Nova.

The change is low risk in that it only adds a new query path to the scheduler, 
and does not alter any existing code paths.

Thanks for the consideration,
Phil
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to