On 11/12/2013 01:36 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2013-11-12 10:01:06 -0800: >> During the freeze phase of Havana we got a ton of new contributors >> coming on board to Tempest, which was super cool. However it meant we >> had this new influx of negative tests (i.e. tests which push invalid >> parameters looking for error codes) which made us realize that human >> creation and review of negative tests really doesn't scale. David Kranz >> is working on a generative model for this now. >> > > Are there some notes or other source material we can follow to understand > this line of thinking? I don't agree or disagree with it, as I don't > really understand, so it would be helpful to have the problems enumerated > and the solution hypothesis stated. Thanks!
Here is our etherpad from the session - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/icehouse-summit-qa-negative-tests - it's actually probably a little sparser than it should be. -Sean -- Sean Dague http://dague.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
