On 14 Nov 2013, at 18:03, Zane Bitter <zbit...@redhat.com> wrote:
> What might be a downside is that sharing a back-end may not be technically
> convenient - one thing we have been reminded of in Heat is that a service
> with timed tasks has to be scaled out in a completely different way to a
> service that avoids them. This may or may not be an issue for Mistral, but it
> could be resolved by having different back-end services that communicate over
> RPC. The front-end API can remain shared though.
Not sure I’m 100% following here. Could you please provide more details on
this? Seems to be an important topic to me. Particularly, what did you mean
when you said “sharing a back-end”? Sharing by which components?
Thanks.
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
