Hi David, Thanks for your time and valuable comments. I have replied to your comments and try to explain why I am advocating to this BP.
Let me know your thoughts, please feel free to update below etherpad https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-scoped-role-definition Thanks again, Arvind -----Original Message----- From: David Chadwick [mailto:d.w.chadw...@kent.ac.uk] Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 12:12 PM To: Tiwari, Arvind; OpenStack Development Mailing List Cc: Henry Nash; ayo...@redhat.com; dolph.math...@gmail.com; Yee, Guang Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition Hi Arvind I have just added some comments to your blueprint page regards David On 19/11/2013 00:01, Tiwari, Arvind wrote: > Hi, > > > > Based on our discussion in design summit , I have redone the service_id > binding with roles BP > <https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/serviceid-binding-with-role-definition>. > I have added a new BP (link below) along with detailed use case to > support this BP. > > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/service-scoped-role-definition > > Below etherpad link has some proposals for Role REST representation and > pros and cons analysis > > > > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-scoped-role-definition > > > > Please take look and let me know your thoughts. > > > > It would be awesome if we can discuss it in tomorrow's meeting. > > > > Thanks, > > Arvind > _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev