I have added a number of comments to this. I have also expanded on the concept of role scoping for your consideration
regards David On 02/12/2013 23:21, Tiwari, Arvind wrote: > Hi Adam and David, > > Thank you so much for all the great comments, seems we are making good > progress. > > I have replied to your comments and also added some to support my proposal > > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-scoped-role-definition > > David, I like your suggestion for role-def scoping which can fit in my Plan B > and I think Adam is cool with plan B. > > Please let me know if David's proposal for role-def scoping is cool for > everybody? > > > Thanks, > Arvind > > -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Young [mailto:ayo...@redhat.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 8:44 AM > To: Tiwari, Arvind; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage > questions) > Cc: Henry Nash; dolph.math...@gmail.com; David Chadwick > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition > > > > On 11/26/2013 06:57 PM, Tiwari, Arvind wrote: >> Hi Adam, >> >> Based on our discussion over IRC, I have updated the below etherpad with >> proposal for nested role definition > > Updated. I made my changes Green. It isn't easy being green. > >> >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-scoped-role-definition >> >> Please take a look @ "Proposal (Ayoung) - Nested role definitions", I am >> sorry if I could not catch your idea. >> >> Feel free to update the etherpad. >> >> Regards, >> Arvind >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Tiwari, Arvind >> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 4:08 PM >> To: David Chadwick; OpenStack Development Mailing List >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition >> >> Hi David, >> >> Thanks for your time and valuable comments. I have replied to your comments >> and try to explain why I am advocating to this BP. >> >> Let me know your thoughts, please feel free to update below etherpad >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-scoped-role-definition >> >> Thanks again, >> Arvind >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: David Chadwick [mailto:d.w.chadw...@kent.ac.uk] >> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 12:12 PM >> To: Tiwari, Arvind; OpenStack Development Mailing List >> Cc: Henry Nash; ayo...@redhat.com; dolph.math...@gmail.com; Yee, Guang >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition >> >> Hi Arvind >> >> I have just added some comments to your blueprint page >> >> regards >> >> David >> >> >> On 19/11/2013 00:01, Tiwari, Arvind wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>> Based on our discussion in design summit , I have redone the service_id >>> binding with roles BP >>> <https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/serviceid-binding-with-role-definition>. >>> I have added a new BP (link below) along with detailed use case to >>> support this BP. >>> >>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/service-scoped-role-definition >>> >>> Below etherpad link has some proposals for Role REST representation and >>> pros and cons analysis >>> >>> >>> >>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/service-scoped-role-definition >>> >>> >>> >>> Please take look and let me know your thoughts. >>> >>> >>> >>> It would be awesome if we can discuss it in tomorrow's meeting. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Arvind >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
