Excerpts from Roman Podoliaka's message of 2017-02-03 17:16:36 +0200: > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Mike Bayer <mba...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Not sure if people on the list are seeing that we are simultaneously talking > > about getting rid of Postgresql in the efforts to support only "one > > database", while at the same time adding one that is in many ways a new > > database. > > ++ > > and, FWIW, moving columns between tables and changing of column types > in order to make NDB storage engine happy both seem to be a way more > intrusive than what we've had to do so far in the code of OpenStack > projects in order to support PostgreSQL. >
I'd just like to add that MySQL Cluster is not "just another database". Please read up on it if you have not. The scale-out capabilities are likely worth some churn (vs. PostgreSQL which is mostly functionally equivalent to InnoDB backed MySQL, and is more of an operational preference). __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
