-----Original Message----- From: Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Date: February 13, 2017 at 10:14:24 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][glance][glare][all] glance/glare/artifacts/images at the PTG
> On 2017-02-13 18:23:19 +0300 (+0300), Mikhail Fedosin wrote: > [...] > > Almost every project works with some binary data and must store it > > somewhere, and almost always storage itself is not the part of the > > project's mission. This issue has often been neglected. For this reason > > there is no single recommended method for storing of binary data, which > > would have a unified public api and hide all the things of the internal > > storage infrastructure. > [...] > > If you'll forgive the sarcasm, it sounds like you're proposing that > OpenStack components should be able to rely on the existence of a > standard service suitable for generalized storage and retrieval of > arbitrary blobs of data through an API. Our trademark > interoperability requirements may even guarantee the presence of one > already in any compliant deployment; I'll have to check... ;) Well it's a storage service, so I hope the name doesn't start with "S". ;D -- Ian Cordasco __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev