On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 3:45 PM Flavio Percoco <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 16/04/17 09:03 +0100, Neil Jerram wrote:
> >FWIW, I think the Lego analogy is not actually helpful for another
> reason: it has vastly too many ways of combining, and (hence) no sense at
> all of consistency / interoperability between the different things that you
> can construct with it. Whereas for OpenStack I believe you are also aiming
> for some forms of consistency and interoperability.
>
> Could you expand on why you think the lego analogy does not cover
> consistency
> and interoperability?
>
Well, for example, because you can build either a house or a jellyfish out
of Lego, and I don't think there's anything about the relationship between
those two things that evokes the consistency that some folks are talking
about / looking for between OpenStack components.
Neil
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
