On Fri, Apr 21 2017, Doug Hellmann wrote:

> My memory of the outcome of that session was that we needed to maintain
> co-installability; that we could continue to keep an eye on the
> container space as an alternative; and that a new team of maintainers
> would take over the requirements list (which was my secret agenda for
> proposing that we stop doing it at all).

Just to come back to the original topic, co-installability is *not*
impacted by my proposal of stopping the sync. On the opposite, last week
it was very hard to install both Gnocchi and Oslo because of Oslo…

So it would *improve* co-installability, not remove it.

My 2c,

-- 
Julien Danjou
// Free Software hacker
// https://julien.danjou.info

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to