On Thu, May 18 2017, Mike Bayer wrote: > I'm not understanding this? do you mean this?
In the long run, yes. Unfortunately, we're not happy with the way Oslo libraries are managed and too OpenStack centric. I've tried for the last couple of years to move things on, but it's barely possible to deprecate anything and contribute, so I feel it's safer to start fresh and better alternative. Cotyledon by Mehdi is a good example of what can be achieved. Though to comment on your example, oslo.db is probably the most useful Oslo library that Gnocchi depends on and that won't go away in a snap. :-( -- Julien Danjou /* Free Software hacker https://julien.danjou.info */
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
