Dims,
The [tc] was in the subject tag, and the message was represented as indicating
some TC directive and has had several tc members comment on the thread. I did
nothing wrong.
Regards
-steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Davanum Srinivas <dava...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Date: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 4:34 AM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]
[tc][infra][release][security][stable][kolla][loci][tripleo][docker][kubernetes]
do we want to be publishing binary container images?
Why drag TC into this discussion Steven? If the TC has something to
say, it will be in the form of a resolution with topic "formal-vote".
So please Stop!
Thanks,
Dims
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 12:22 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) <std...@cisco.com>
wrote:
> Flavio,
>
> Forgive the top post – outlook ftw.
>
> I understand the concerns raised in this thread. It is unclear if this
thread is the feeling of two TC members or enough TC members care deeply about
this issue to permanently limit OpenStack big tent projects’ ability to
generate container images in various external artifact storage systems. The
point of discussion I see effectively raised in this thread is “OpenStack infra
will not push images to dockerhub”.
>
> I’d like clarification if this is a ruling from the TC, or simply an
exploratory discussion.
>
> If it is exploratory, it is prudent that OpenStack projects not be
blocked by debate on this issue until the TC has made such ruling as to banning
the creation of container images via OpenStack infrastructure.
>
> Regards
> -steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com>
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Date: Monday, May 15, 2017 at 7:00 PM
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]
[tc][infra][release][security][stable][kolla][loci][tripleo][docker][kubernetes]
do we want to be publishing binary container images?
>
> On 15/05/17 12:32 -0700, Michał Jastrzębski wrote:
> >On 15 May 2017 at 12:12, Doug Hellmann <d...@doughellmann.com> wrote:
>
> [huge snip]
>
> >>> > I'm raising the issue here to get some more input into how to
> >>> > proceed. Do other people think this concern is overblown? Can we
> >>> > mitigate the risk by communicating through metadata for the
images?
> >>> > Should we stick to publishing build instructions (Dockerfiles,
or
> >>> > whatever) instead of binary images? Are there other options I
haven't
> >>> > mentioned?
> >>>
> >>> Today we do publish build instructions, that's what Kolla is. We
also
> >>> publish built containers already, just we do it manually on
release
> >>> today. If we decide to block it, I assume we should stop doing
that
> >>> too? That will hurt users who uses this piece of Kolla, and I'd
hate
> >>> to hurt our users:(
> >>
> >> Well, that's the question. Today we have teams publishing those
> >> images themselves, right? And the proposal is to have infra do it?
> >> That change could be construed to imply that there is more of a
> >> relationship with the images and the rest of the community
(remember,
> >> folks outside of the main community activities do not always make
> >> the same distinctions we do about teams). So, before we go ahead
> >> with that, I want to make sure that we all have a chance to discuss
> >> the policy change and its implications.
> >
> >Infra as vm running with infra, but team to publish it can be Kolla
> >team. I assume we'll be responsible to keep these images healthy...
>
> I think this is the gist of the concern and I'd like us to focus on
it.
>
> As someone that used to consume these images from kolla's dockerhub
account
> directly, I can confirm they are useful. However, I do share Doug's
concern and
> the impact this may have on the community.
>
> From a release perspective, as Doug mentioned, we've avoided
releasing projects
> in any kind of built form. This was also one of the concerns I raised
when
> working on the proposal to support other programming languages. The
problem of
> releasing built images goes beyond the infrastructure requirements.
It's the
> message and the guarantees implied with the built product itself that
are the
> concern here. And I tend to agree with Doug that this might be a
problem for us
> as a community. Unfortunately, putting your name, Michal, as contact
point is
> not enough. Kolla is not the only project producing container images
and we need
> to be consistent in the way we release these images.
>
> Nothing prevents people for building their own images and uploading
them to
> dockerhub. Having this as part of the OpenStack's pipeline is a
problem.
>
> Flavio
>
> P.S: note this goes against my container(ish) interests but it's a
> community-wide problem.
>
> --
> @flaper87
> Flavio Percoco
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
