On 2017-05-16 09:38:34 -0400 (-0400), Davanum Srinivas wrote: > See $TITLE :)
Trying not to rehash other points, I'm in favor of using #openstack-dev for now until we see it's not working out. Creating a new channel for this purpose before we've even undertaken the experiment seems like a social form of premature optimization. If the concern is that it's hard to get the attention of (I hate to say "ping" since contextlessly highlighting people in channel to find out whether they're around is especially annoying to me at least) members of the OpenStack Technical Committee, the Infra team's root sysadmins already solved this issue by all configuring their clients to highliht on a specific keyword (in that case, "infra-root" mentioned in channel gets the attention of most of our rooters these days). Something like "tc-members" can be used to address a question specifically to those on the TC who happen to be around and paying attention and also gives people looking at the logs a useful string to grep/search/whatever. I've gone ahead and configured my client to highlight on that now. As for losing context when a discussion transfers from informal temperature taking, brainstorming and bikeshedding in IRC to a less synchronous thread on the ML, simply making sure to include a URL to the point in the channel log where the discussion began ought to be sufficient (and should be encouraged _regardless_ of which channel that was). -- Jeremy Stanley
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
