On 16 May 2017 at 16:08, Doug Hellmann <d...@doughellmann.com> wrote: > Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2017-05-16 10:49:54 -0400: >> On 05/16/2017 09:38 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: >> > Folks, >> > >> > See $TITLE :) >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Dims >> >> I'd rather avoid #openstack-tc and just use #openstack-dev. >> #openstack-dev is pretty low used environment (compared to like >> #openstack-infra or #openstack-nova). I've personally been trying to >> make it my go to way to hit up members of other teams whenever instead >> of diving into project specific channels, because typically it means we >> can get a broader conversation around the item in question. >> >> Our fragmentation of shared understanding on many issues is definitely >> exacerbated by many project channels, and the assumption that people >> need to watch 20+ different channels, with different context, to stay up >> on things. >> >> I would love us to have the problem that too many interesting topics are >> being discussed in #openstack-dev that we feel the need to parallelize >> them with a different channel. But I would say we should wait until >> that's actually a problem. >> >> -Sean > > +1, let's start with just the -dev channel and see if volume becomes > an issue.
+1 my preference is to just start with the -dev channel, and see how we go. +1 all the comments about the history and the discussion needing to be summarised via ML/gerrit anyway. We can link to the logs of the -dev channel for the "raw" discussion. Thanks, johnthetubaguy __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
