On Jun 8, 2017, at 11:59 AM, Chris Dent <cdent...@anticdent.org> wrote: > > The naming issue related to an optional field we want to add to the > microversion discovery document. Some projects wish to be able to signal that > they are intending to raise the minimum microversion at a point in the > future. The name for the next minimum version is fairly clear: > "next_min_version". What's less clear is the name which can be used for the > field that states the earliest date at which this will happen. This cannot be > a definitive date because different deployments will release the new code at > different times. We can only say "it will be no earlier than this time". > > Naming this field has proven difficult. The original was "not_before", but > that has no association with "min_version" so is potentially confusing. > However, people who know how to parse the doc will know what it means so it > may not matter. As always, naming is hard, so we seek input from the > community to help us find a suitable name. This is something we don't want to > ever have to change, so it needs to be correct from the start. Candidates > include: > > * not_before > * not_raise_min_before > * min_raise_not_before > * earliest_min_raise_date > * min_version_eol_date > * next_min_version_effective_date > > If you have an opinion on any of these, or a better suggestion please let us > know, either on the review at <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/446138/ > <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/446138/>>, or in response to this message.
Even better: please respond on the SurveyMonkey page to rank your preferences! https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/L7XWNG5 <https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/L7XWNG5> -- Ed Leafe
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
