Greetings OpenStack community,

Today's meeting started off with continued discussion about the Guided Review 
process that we are trying to create ahead of the Denver PTG, where we would 
like to incorporate such a process as part of our sessions. This has been 
crystallized into a document [0] by elmiko. One point that is still to be added 
is how we record discussions after the fact, so that they can be preserved and 
referenced in the future.

The bulk of the meeting was taken up in discussing the proposed change from a 
Working Group (WG) to a Special Interest Group (SIG). This is in response to 
Thierry Carrez's email [4] on the subject. No one had any particularly strong 
feelings either way; I mean, we want to be as useful as possible to as many 
people as possible, but it's simply not clear whether the change to being a SIG 
would a) make that easier, or b) make that more difficult, or c) have no 
effect. In our case, this is also complicated by the fact that we are small, 
and expanding to a wider audience might be too much. Or it may bring in lots of 
new people to help out. We really don't know. We will continue to discuss this 
on the mailing list and future meetings.

There are no new guidelines for this week, but a small update to an existing 
document [5] was merged.


# Newly Published Guidelines

None this week.

# API Guidelines Proposed for Freeze

Guidelines that are ready for wider review by the whole community.

None this week

# Guidelines Currently Under Review [3]

* A (shrinking) suite of several documents about doing version and service 
discovery
  Start at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/459405/

* WIP: microversion architecture archival doc (very early; not yet ready for 
review)
  https://review.openstack.org/444892

# Highlighting your API impacting issues

If you seek further review and insight from the API WG, please address your 
concerns in an email to the OpenStack developer mailing list[1] with the tag 
"[api]" in the subject. In your email, you should include any relevant reviews, 
links, and comments to help guide the discussion of the specific challenge you 
are facing.

To learn more about the API WG mission and the work we do, see OpenStack API 
Working Group [2].

Thanks for reading and see you next week!

# References

[0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/487847/
[1] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[2] http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/api-wg/
[3] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/api-wg,n,z
[4] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-sigs/2017-July/000022.html
[5] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/487504/

Meeting Agenda
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/API-WG#Agenda
Past Meeting Records
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/api_wg/
Open Bugs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-api-wg

-- Ed Leafe





Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to