Flavio Percoco wrote: > I've been working a bit with the Glance team and trying to help where I > can and I can't but be worried about the critical status of the Glance team. > Unfortunately, the number of participants in the Glance team has been > reduced a lot resulting in the project not being able to keep up with the > goals, the > reviews required, etc.[0]
Are there more specific areas where the Glance team struggles ? > I've always said that Glance is one of those critical projects that not many > people notice until it breaks. It's in every OpenStack cloud sitting in > a corner and allowing for VMs to be booted. So, before things get even worse, > I'd > like us to brainstorm a bit on what solutions/options we have now. > > I know Glance is not the only project "suffering" from lack of contributors > but > I don't want us to get to the point where there won't be contributors left. > > How do people feel about adding Glance to the list of "help wanted" areas of > interest? I think that makes sense. Glance (like Keystone, Cinder or Neutron) is a project that other teams depend on. > Would it be possible to get help w/ reviews from folks from teams like > nova/cinder/keystone? Any help is welcomed, of course, but I'm trying to > think about teams that may be familiar with the Glance code/api already. I was hoping the VM & BM working group would be the right place to discuss those priorities and make sure the minimal work is covered. What's the status of that initiative ? -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
