On 06/12/2017 03:53 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 12/06/17 16:21, Steven Hardy wrote:
I think we wanted to move to convergence anyway so I don't see a problem
with this. I know there was some discussion about starting to test with
convergence in tripleo-ci, does anyone know what, if anything,
happened with
that?
There's an experimental job that runs only on the heat repo
(gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-nonha-convergence)
But yeah now seems like a good time to get something running more
regularly in tripleo-ci.
+1, there's no reason not to run a non-voting job against tripleo itself
at this point IMHO. That would allow me to start tracking the memory use
over time.
Do you have a strong preference multinode vs. ovb? I would tend to
think we want this to be ovb since multinode stubs out a bunch of stuff,
but at the same time ovb capacity is limited. It's better* now that
we've basically halved our ovb ci coverage so we could probably get away
with adding a job to a specific repo though (t-h-t seems logical for
this purpose).
*for some definition of "better"
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
