On 2017-06-15 11:15:36 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote: [...] > I'd like to propose that we introduce a new concept: "OpenStack-Hosted > projects". There would be "OpenStack projects" on one side, and > "Projects hosted on OpenStack infrastructure" on the other side (all > still under the openstack/ git repo prefix).
I'm still unconvinced a term is needed for this. Can't we just have "OpenStack Projects" (those under TC governance) and "everything else?" Why must the existence of any term require a term for its opposite? > We'll stop saying "official OpenStack project" and "unofficial > OpenStack project". The only "OpenStack projects" will be the > official ones. We'll chase down the last mentions of "big tent" in > documentation and remove it from our vocabulary. [...] I agree on getting rid of the "big tent" phrase anywhere we find it, though I thought we'd already avoided using that in favor of more descriptive terminology anyway. Also I'm very excited to see a focus on "OpenStack projects" I just don't see a benefit to making up a name for "not an OpenStack project." -- Jeremy Stanley
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
