Excerpts from Dan Smith's message of 2017-09-20 10:09:54 -0700: > >> - Modify the `supports-upgrades`[3] and `supports-accessible-upgrades`[4] > >> tags > >> > >> I have yet to look into the formal process around making changes to > >> these tags but I will aim to make a start ASAP. > > > > We've previously tried to avoid changing assert tag definitions because > > we then have to re-review all of the projects that already have the tags > > to ensure they meet the new criteria. It might be easier to add a new > > tag for assert:supports-fast-forward-upgrades with the criteria that are > > unique to this use case. > > We already have a confusing array of upgrade tags, so I would really > rather not add more that overlap in complicated ways. Most of the change > here is clarification of things I think most people assume, so I don't > think the validation effort will be a lot of work. > > --Dan
OK, I'll wait to see what the actual updates look like before commenting further, but it sounds like working on the existing tag definitions is a good first step. Doug __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
