On 09/20/2017 02:25 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Dan Smith's message of 2017-09-20 10:09:54 -0700:
- Modify the `supports-upgrades`[3] and `supports-accessible-upgrades`[4] tags
I have yet to look into the formal process around making changes to
these tags but I will aim to make a start ASAP.
We've previously tried to avoid changing assert tag definitions because
we then have to re-review all of the projects that already have the tags
to ensure they meet the new criteria. It might be easier to add a new
tag for assert:supports-fast-forward-upgrades with the criteria that are
unique to this use case.
We already have a confusing array of upgrade tags, so I would really
rather not add more that overlap in complicated ways. Most of the change
here is clarification of things I think most people assume, so I don't
think the validation effort will be a lot of work.
--Dan
OK, I'll wait to see what the actual updates look like before commenting
further, but it sounds like working on the existing tag definitions is a
good first step.
Agreed. We're already at 5 upgrade tags now?
I think honestly we're going to need a picture to explain the
differences between them. Based on the confusion that kept seeming to
come during discussions at the PTG, I think we need to circle around and
figure out if there are different ways to explain this to have greater
clarity.
-Sean
--
Sean Dague
http://dague.net
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
