> I just need an understanding on the impact and the timeline. Replying > here is sufficient. > > I assume since some of this work was sort of done earlier outside of > tripleo and does not affect the default installation path that most > folks will consume, it shouldn't be impacting to general testing or > increase regressions. My general requirement for anyone who needed an > FFE for functionality that isn't essential is that it's off by > default, has minimal impact to the existing functionality and we have > a rough estimate on feature landing. Do you have idea when you expect > to land this functionality? Additionally the patches seem to be > primarily around the ironic integration so have those been sorted out?
I have been working on a multi-architecture patch for TripleO and am almost ready to submit a WIP to r.o.o. I have delayed until I can get all of the testcases passing. Currently the patches exist at: https://hamzy.fedorapeople.org/TripleO-multi-arch/05.bb2b96e/0001-fix_multi_arch-tripleo-common.patch https://hamzy.fedorapeople.org/TripleO-multi-arch/05.cc5fee3/0001-fix_multi_arch-python-tripleoclient.patch And the full installation instructions are at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Hamzy/TripleO_mixed_undercloud_overcloud_try9 What I have done at a high level is to rename the images into architecture specific images. For example, (undercloud) [stack@oscloud5 ~]$ openstack image list +--------------------------------------+-------------------------------+--------+ | ID | Name | Status | +--------------------------------------+-------------------------------+--------+ | fa0ed7cb-21d7-427b-b8cb-7c62f0ff7760 | ppc64le-bm-deploy-kernel | active | | 94dc2adf-49ce-4db5-b914-970b57a8127f | ppc64le-bm-deploy-ramdisk | active | | 6c50587d-dd29-41ba-8971-e0abf3429020 | ppc64le-overcloud-full | active | | 59e512a7-990e-4689-85d2-f1f4e1e6e7a8 | x86_64-bm-deploy-kernel | active | | bcad2821-01be-4556-b686-31c70bb64716 | x86_64-bm-deploy-ramdisk | active | | 3ab489fa-32c7-4758-a630-287c510fc473 | x86_64-overcloud-full | active | | 661f18f7-4d99-43e8-b7b8-f5c8a9d5b116 | x86_64-overcloud-full-initrd | active | | 4a09c422-3de0-46ca-98c3-7c6f1f7717ff | x86_64-overcloud-full-vmlinuz | active | +--------------------------------------+-------------------------------+--------+ This will change existing functionality. I still need to work with RedHat on changing the patch for their needs, but it currently can deploy an x86_64 undercloud, an x86_64 overcloud controller node and a ppc64le overcloud compute node.
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev