On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Mark Hamzy <ha...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Alex Schultz <aschu...@redhat.com> wrote on 12/14/2017 09:24:54 AM: >> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Mark Hamzy <ha...@us.ibm.com> wrote: >> ... As I said previously, please post the >> patches ASAP so we can get eyes on these changes. Since this does >> have an impact on the existing functionality this should have been >> merged earlier in the cycle so we could work out any user facing >> issues. > > Sorry about that. > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/528000/ > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/528060/ >
I reviewed it a bit and I think you can put in the backwards compatibility in the few spots I listed. The problem is really that a Queens undercloud (tripleoclient/tripleo-common) needs to be able to manage a Pike undercloud. For now I think we can grant the FFE because it's not too bad if this is the only bit of changes we need to make. But we will need to solve for the backwards compatibility prior to merging. I'll update the blueprint with this. Thanks, -Alex > I will see how easy it is to also support the old naming convention... > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev