+1
I would really hate to not have a place to reference people to, but the
documentation now provides such place. Keeping the examples up-to-date is quite
annoying, I'm all for dropping them.
On 01/22/2018 01:45 PM, John Garbutt wrote:
Hi,
While I was looking at the traits work, I noticed we still have policy and
config in tree for ironic and ironic inspector:
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/ironic/tree/etc/ironic/policy.json.sample
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/ironic/tree/etc/ironic/ironic.conf.sample
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/ironic/tree/etc/ironic/policy.json
And in a similar way:
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/ironic-inspector/tree/policy.yaml.sample
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/ironic-inspector/tree/example.conf
There is an argument that says we shouldn't force operators to build a full
environment to generate these, but this has been somewhat superseded by us
having good docs:
https://docs.openstack.org/ironic/latest/configuration/sample-config.html
https://docs.openstack.org/ironic/latest/configuration/sample-policy.html
https://docs.openstack.org/ironic-inspector/latest/configuration/sample-config.html
https://docs.openstack.org/ironic-inspector/latest/configuration/sample-policy.html
It could look something like this (but with the tests working...):
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/536349
What do you all think?
Thanks,
johnthetubaguy
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
