Thanks for bringing it up John. I totally forgot about that. Not only are the samples in the docs, there is a link in those docs so that the sample can be downloaded as a file. Also, for a patch that modifies the configs, you can see the rendered file(s) via the generated docs. PROFIT! :)
+1. --ruby Now to deal with the "<No description provided>" in our config file... grumble, grumble... From: Jim Rollenhagen <j...@jimrollenhagen.com> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Date: Monday, January 22, 2018 at 3:55 PM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Remove in-tree policy and config? Huge +1, I didn't realize this was in docs now. We can finally stop doing it manually \o/ // jim On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 7:45 AM, John Garbutt <j...@johngarbutt.com<mailto:j...@johngarbutt.com>> wrote: Hi, While I was looking at the traits work, I noticed we still have policy and config in tree for ironic and ironic inspector: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/ironic/tree/etc/ironic/policy.json.sample http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/ironic/tree/etc/ironic/ironic.conf.sample http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/ironic/tree/etc/ironic/policy.json And in a similar way: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/ironic-inspector/tree/policy.yaml.sample http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/ironic-inspector/tree/example.conf There is an argument that says we shouldn't force operators to build a full environment to generate these, but this has been somewhat superseded by us having good docs: https://docs.openstack.org/ironic/latest/configuration/sample-config.html https://docs.openstack.org/ironic/latest/configuration/sample-policy.html https://docs.openstack.org/ironic-inspector/latest/configuration/sample-config.html https://docs.openstack.org/ironic-inspector/latest/configuration/sample-policy.html It could look something like this (but with the tests working...): https://review.openstack.org/#/c/536349 What do you all think? Thanks, johnthetubaguy __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
