On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Matthew Thode <prometheanf...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > * Proper fix would be to make ceph support the account field > Is the 'rgw_swift_account_in_url' option not correct/sufficient? > * Workaround would be to specify an old swiftclient to install (3.1.0, > pre-ocata) > Doesn't seem great if a sysadmin wants to co-install the newer swiftclient cli > * Workaround would be to for swiftclient to be forked and 'fixed' > > Not clear to me what the "fix" would be here - just don't do validation? I'll assume the "fork threat" here is for completeness/emphasis :D Do you know if ironic works with "normal" swift tempurls or only the radosgw implementation of the swift api? -Clay
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
