On 18-05-09 12:24:32, Clay Gerrard wrote: > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Matthew Thode <prometheanf...@gentoo.org> > wrote: > > > > > * Proper fix would be to make ceph support the account field > > > > Is the 'rgw_swift_account_in_url' option not correct/sufficient? >
I didn't see that option, I'll test and get back to you on it. > > * Workaround would be to specify an old swiftclient to install (3.1.0, > > pre-ocata) > > > > Doesn't seem great if a sysadmin wants to co-install the newer swiftclient > cli > > > > * Workaround would be to for swiftclient to be forked and 'fixed' > > > > > Not clear to me what the "fix" would be here - just don't do validation? > I'll assume the "fork threat" here is for completeness/emphasis :D > > Do you know if ironic works with "normal" swift tempurls or only the > radosgw implementation of the swift api? > -- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
