On 17/12/13 11:54 +0100, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
On 2013/16/12 15:19, Flavio Percoco wrote:I don't agree on this point. There might be supportive teams, which are helping OpenStack in general (like UX) and they are not exactly part of release cycles. Why should this team and effort be excluded from official recognition?1. Programs that are not part of OpenStack's release cycle shouldn't be considered official nor they should have the rights that integrated projects have.
They do receive recognition. Infrastructure, Documentation, Release Management. Those are programs that don't have actual projects but are critical for OpenStack's releases. It's a matter of just labeling the program as official. My point there is about Programs that just have a non integrated project under their umbrella. Cheers, FF
-- Jarda _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-- @flaper87 Flavio Percoco
pgpDtBQm5Kxs5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
