On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 12:41 PM, Mathieu Gagné <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Julia, > > Thanks for the follow up on this topic. > > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 6:55 AM, Julia Kreger > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> These things are not just frustrating, but also very inhibiting for >> part time contributors such as students who may also be time limited. >> Or an operator who noticed something that was clearly a bug and that >> put forth a very minor fix and doesn't have the time to revise it over >> and over. >> > > What I found frustrating is receiving *only* nitpicks, addressing them > to only receive more nitpicks (sometimes from the same reviewer) with > no substantial review on the change itself afterward. > I wouldn't mind addressing nitpicks if more substantial reviews were > made in a timely fashion.
The behavior that I've tried to promote in communities I've partaken is: If your review is comprised solely of nits, either abandon it, or don't -1. > > -- > Mathieu > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
