FWIW, as an outside observer of this conversation:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 10:46 AM Thierry Carrez <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
> The issue is that the current method (which uses a formula to apply
> single-vendor and diverse-affiliation tags) is not working so well
> anymore, with lots of low-activity projects quickly flapping between
> states.
>
I think you need to explore and state much more explicitly why this is a
problem, before you will be able to evaluate possible changes.
> One important thing to remember is that the diversity tags are supposed
> to inform deployers, so that they can make informed choices on which
> component they are comfortable to deploy. So whatever we come up with,
> it needs to be useful information for deployers, not just a badge of
> honor for developers, or a statement of team internal policy.
>
It sounds like this might be part of that 'why'. How sure are you about it?
Regards,
Neil
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
