Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2018-08-02 13:13:21 +0000: > On 2018-08-02 10:58:53 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote: > [...] > > Finally, RefStack: I feel like this should be wrapped into an > > Interoperability SIG, since that project team is not producing > > "OpenStack", but helping fostering OpenStack interoperability. > > Having separate groups (Interop WG, RefStack) sounds overkill > > anyway, and with the introduction of SIGs we have been recentering > > project teams on upstream code production. > > That was one of the possibilities I discussed with them during their > meeting a month ago: > > http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23refstack/%23refstack.2018-07-03.log.html#t2018-07-03T17:05:43 > > Election official hat off and TC Refstack liaison hat on, I think if > Chris Hoge doesn't volunteer to act as PTL this cycle to oversee > shutting down the team and reassigning its deliverables, then we > need to help them fast-track that nowish and not appoint a Stein > cycle PTL.
This came up at a joint leadership meeting right after we created SIGs and the Interop WG was reluctant to make any structural changes at the time because they had just gone through a renaming process for the working group. Changing "WG" to "SIG" feels much lighter weight, so maybe we can move ahead with that now. Doug __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev