On 01/07/2014 02:31 AM, Luke Gorrie wrote: > On 6 January 2014 18:12, Collins, Sean <sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com> > wrote: >> How should we handle existing -1's that have been posted? > > I suggest removing/ignoring those votes until we see if they are spurious. I is my belief that Sean is asking for these votes to be removed. It is also my belief that the account that voted -1 is the only one that can change the vote.
I think you are being asked to clean up after yourself. That is the way I am reading it. Doing so would certainly help the whole "we are worthy of your trust" issue for your account, when you would like verification voting enabled. Thanks, Anita. > > The Tail-f NCS plugin is very simple code and I'd say it's unlikely > that any recent changes will have broken it in a non-trivial way. > Probably we will find there is no serious issue and it's only teething > problems on the test integration. > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
