Hi Once a common library is in place, is there any intention to (or resistance against) collapsing the clients into a single project or even a single command (a la busybox)?
(I'm thinking reduced load for packagers, simpler installation for users, etc) Cheers, -- Chris Jones > On 15 Jan 2014, at 19:37, Doug Hellmann <doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com> wrote: > > Several people have mentioned to me that they are interested in, or actively > working on, code related to a "common" client library -- something meant to > be reused directly as a basis for creating a common library for all of the > openstack clients to use. There's a blueprint [1] in oslo, and I believe the > keystone devs and unified CLI teams are probably interested in ensuring that > the resulting API ends up meeting all of our various requirements. > > If you're interested in this effort, please subscribe to the blueprint and > use that to coordinate efforts so we don't produce more than one common > library. ;-) > > Thanks, > Doug > > > [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo/+spec/common-client-library-2 > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
