Probably all PTLs could be asked to prepare initial report for requirements like it was done last time for graduating projects.
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Dina Belova <dbel...@mirantis.com> wrote: > I propose we do this in future TC meetings, time permitting. I >> propose we start with projects where the PTL was also elected to the TC, >> so that we give this new review's process some mileage. > > > +1, good idea > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org>wrote: > >> Dina Belova wrote: >> > Perhaps we should start putting each project on the TC agenda for a >> > review of its current standing. For any gaps, I think we should >> set a >> > specific timeframe for when we expect these gaps to be filled. >> > >> > >> > Really good idea. New requirements are great, but frankly speaking not >> > all currently integrated projects fit all of them. >> > Will be nice to find out all gaps there and fix them asap. >> >> Agreed. I propose we do this in future TC meetings, time permitting. I >> propose we start with projects where the PTL was also elected to the TC, >> so that we give this new review's process some mileage. >> >> So.. Nova, Cinder, Neutron ? >> >> -- >> Thierry Carrez (ttx) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Dina Belova > > Software Engineer > > Mirantis Inc. > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -- Sincerely yours, Sergey Lukjanov Savanna Technical Lead Mirantis Inc.
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev